Later vs Metricool: work out what your unit is before you pick
Later charges for users and social sets. Metricool charges for brands. Both are mid-market and similarly priced at the entry point, so the meter is what separates them.
Charleston Smith
Founder, Vantr
Aug 31, 2026 · 9 min read
Photo by William Warby on Unsplash
Later and Metricool land in similar territory on price at the entry point. Later Starter is $18.75 / month billed yearly. Metricool Starter is From $20 / month billed yearly. Close enough that price alone will not choose for you.
What will choose for you is the unit each one bills by, because they picked opposite ones.
Two different units
Later is "A scheduling and social media management tool sold in tiers, with users and social sets as paid add-ons.". The unit is users and social sets, sold as add-ons on top of a tier. Starter is stated as limited to one user.
Metricool is "An analytics-led social media tool priced by how many brands you manage, with a free tier for one brand.". The unit is brands. Free covers one. Starter at From $20 / month billed yearly covers up to five. Advanced at From $53 / month billed yearly covers up to fifteen.
So Later gets more expensive when more people need in, and Metricool gets more expensive when more clients come on. Neither is wrong. They are aimed at different shapes of business.
The two-question test
Answer these honestly and the choice usually falls out.
How many separate businesses or clients do you post for? Not accounts. Businesses. Your own brand is one, even if it spans eight platforms. Each client is another.
How many people need their own login? Not how many people are involved. How many need their own credentials, ideally with their own permissions.
If your client count is the number that is growing, Metricool's meter is the one that stays still while you grow. Fifteen brands on Advanced is a lot of runway for a small agency.
If your headcount is the number that is growing and you serve one or two brands, Later's tier plus a small number of user add-ons may work out fine, and you should price the exact configuration rather than the headline.
If both numbers are one, you are inside Metricool's free tier and outside Later's paid floor, and the cheapest correct answer is to try the free one first.
Add-on pricing needs pricing, not skimming
The single most common mistake with Later is comparing its headline plan price against a competitor's all-in price. The headline is a base. Users are add-ons and social sets are add-ons, and the page says so.
Before you compare, build the actual configuration: your tier, plus the users you need, plus the sets you need. That is your number. It may still be competitive, and it may not be, but the headline is not it.
Metricool's brand caps are inclusive by contrast: up to five, up to fifteen. The cap is the thing to watch, not add-ons. The failure mode there is different, which is signing an eleventh client and jumping a tier.
Promotions and billing periods
Later's listed prices were billed yearly and the page showed a 25 percent promotion at the time of checking. Two things follow: the figure assumes a year paid up front, and it is not what renewal will cost.
Metricool publishes both cycles, which makes the comparison cleaner: Starter is listed as "Up to 5 brands; $25 / month billed monthly", so the monthly premium is visible rather than inferred.
If you are comparing seriously, put both on the same basis. Annual against annual, at the non-promotional rate.
What neither pricing page settles
Both tools schedule and both report on results. Beyond that, this page does not rank their features, because neither company's public pricing page states them in a way that could be verified and dated. Metricool's own positioning leads with analytics and Later's leads with scheduling and management, which is a hint about emphasis rather than a claim about capability.
The good news is that Metricool has a free tier, so testing the analytics claim costs nothing. Do that before paying either of them.
A fourteen-day protocol that actually decides it
These two are close enough on price that reading about them is a poor use of time compared to using them. Metricool has a free tier, and Later offers paid plans you can start and cancel. Two weeks settles it.
Days one and two: connect everything and note what fails. Connect every account you genuinely post to, in both tools. Write down anything that will not connect, needs a business account, or asks for a permission you are not willing to grant. This alone eliminates one of them for a meaningful number of people, and it costs nothing to find out.
Days three to nine: publish real content from both. Alternate. Odd days from one, even days from the other. Use real posts with real media, not test strings. A tool that handles a text update perfectly can be awkward with a vertical video and a first comment.
Day ten: break something on purpose. Schedule a post and then edit it. Reschedule one to a different day. Delete one from the queue. Post to a platform that has a quirk you know about. The differences between scheduling tools are almost entirely in recovery from mistakes, never in the happy path.
Days eleven and twelve: pull the report you actually owe someone. Whatever you send a client, a manager, or yourself at month end. Produce it in both. If one takes ten minutes and the other takes an hour, that is your answer and it is worth more than any price difference on this page.
Day thirteen: price your real configuration. Not the headline. Your tier plus your users plus your sets, or your brand count against the tier that holds it. At the standard rate, not the promotional one.
Day fourteen: pick, and cancel the other one that day. Do not leave a paid subscription running "just in case". That is how people end up paying for two tools for a year.
Where the money actually leaks
Neither of these will bankrupt anyone, but both have a characteristic way of costing more than expected.
The add-on model leaks through people. A tier that is stated as one user is fine until a virtual assistant needs access, then a designer, then a second client contact who wants to see the calendar. Each is small and each is permanent. Price the configuration you will have in a year.
The brand model leaks through dormant clients. A workspace created for a project that ended still counts toward the cap. You find out when the eleventh client is not the eleventh, it is the fourteenth, because three of them churned and nobody cleaned up. Audit brands quarterly.
Both leak through annual commitments. Annual billing is meaningfully cheaper and it is a twelve-month bet on your own shape. If your client count or team size is volatile, the monthly premium is buying optionality, and that can be the correct purchase.
Choosing when both fit
If the two-question test came back mixed, and plenty of people are genuinely one brand and two people, the tie-break is not price. It is which one you will open.
Two honest tie-breakers:
Which one makes the thing you do most often fastest? For most people that is "write a post, attach media, choose channels, schedule". Count the clicks. Do it three times in each tool, not once, because the first time in any interface is slow.
Which one's reporting do you trust? Not which is prettier. Which one, when it shows you a number, makes you confident enough to put it in front of someone else. Analytics tools differ in how they handle attribution windows and platform quirks, and the one whose numbers you can defend is the one you should use.
Common questions
Is Metricool's free plan enough for a creator?
If you are one brand, the brand cap does not bind, so it can be. The plan is listed as $0 / month for one brand. Whether the features on the free plan are enough is worth testing rather than assuming, and testing is free.
Does Later have a free plan?
Its page showed only paid plans when last checked. That is recorded here as "not stated" rather than as a statement that they have none, because a pricing page not listing something is not proof it does not exist. Check the current page.
Which is better for agencies?
The per-brand model, on price, and by a wide margin as clients accumulate: From $53 / month billed yearly for up to fifteen brands is a low cost per client. The counterweight is per-person permissions and client approvals, which neither pricing page states and which you should test.
Is Later's promotional price permanent?
Its page showed a 25 percent promotion when these figures were checked. Promotional rates generally apply to an initial term and renew at the standard rate. Budget year two at the standard rate.
Can I move my scheduled posts between them?
Assume not. Scheduled content rarely transfers between scheduling tools. Plan to overlap by one billing cycle and let the old queue drain rather than trying to migrate it.
The numbers, side by side
Later
| Plan | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $18.75 / month billed yearly | Page showed a 25% off promotion; limited to 1 user |
| Growth | $37.50 / month billed yearly | Page showed a 25% off promotion |
| Scale | $82.50 / month billed yearly | Page showed a 25% off promotion |
Later's pricing and features checked on 9 September 2026, from their own site.
Metricool
| Plan | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month | Manage 1 brand |
| Starter | From $20 / month billed yearly | Up to 5 brands; $25 / month billed monthly |
| Advanced | From $53 / month billed yearly | Up to 15 brands; $67 / month billed monthly |
| Custom | Contact them |
Metricool's pricing and features checked on 9 September 2026, from their own site.
A note on what this page will not do: it compares pricing, pricing models and each company's own positioning, all read off their public pages on the dates shown. It does not rank their features against each other. Both companies ship a great deal that their pricing pages do not enumerate, and inventing a feature gap for either would be worse than leaving the question open. Trial both; the models below are what decide it for most people anyway.
If neither is quite the shape of your problem
Both tools on this page manage content. Neither carries the business the content is for: the brand deal, the deliverables and their due dates, the contract, the invoice, or what any of it earned.
If that is the part costing you evenings, Vantr is built around it and publishes to 12 platforms alongside. It has a free tier, so you can see whether that is your missing piece before paying anything. If the money side already works for you, ignore this and pick from the two above.
Sources
Vantr helps you post everywhere, then run the business behind it.
One upload to every platform, plus brand-deal tracking, earnings, and a creator profile built from your real stats. Free to start.
Try Vantr freeRead next
How to plan a month of content in an afternoon
Stop deciding what to post every single day. A repeatable system to plan, batch, and schedule a whole month in one focused session.
Charleston Smith
Founder, Vantr
Vantr vs Later: visual planning against a creator business
Later is built around the Instagram grid and does it beautifully. Vantr is built around what happens after the post goes out. Where each one fits.
Charleston Smith
Founder, Vantr
Buffer vs Metricool: per channel or per brand, and why the bill diverges
Buffer charges for every channel you connect. Metricool charges for every brand you manage. Run the same growth through both and the bills go in opposite directions.
Charleston Smith
Founder, Vantr